Dialogue between Russia and Mali: Polytechnician Issa Togo at a meeting with the Russian Foreign Ministry in St. Petersburg

Translation. Region: Russian Federation –

Source: Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University –

An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.

The representative of the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs in St. Petersburg, Maxim Poletaev, held a protocol meeting with the Honorary Consul of the Republic of Mali in St. Petersburg, and also Ambassador of Russian Education and Science Issoy Togo, from SPbPU. The partners discussed the current state and prospects of Russian-Malian interregional cooperation, the activities of the Honorary Consul in St. Petersburg, including issues of consular services. They also touched on the topic of Malian students studying at Russian universities and their participation in events commemorating memorable dates in Russian history.

They also touched on the joint Russian-Malian project to establish a Polytechnic University in Bamako, modeled on St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, and discussed the prospects for reforming Mali's education system, taking into account Russia's extensive experience. Issa Togo is an associate professor at the Institute of Energy's School of Hydraulic and Power Engineering.

During the meeting, the activities of the Russian-African Network University consortium were also discussed. Touching on prospects for developing interregional ties, the parties discussed the preparation of a memorandum of cooperation between St. Petersburg and Bamako, as well as the need to expand contacts in the Northwestern Federal District.

Particular attention was given to the idea of holding the next round of the "Cross Views" school competition in the following format: students from Russian and Malian schools study the culture and history of their partner countries, after which they write essays about Russia and Mali, respectively. The essays are judged by a jury consisting of representatives from both countries.

Please note: This information is raw content obtained directly from the source. It represents an accurate account of the source's assertions and does not necessarily reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

Tashkent-66: How a student brigade became a life's work and a friendship that lasted 60 years

Translation. Region: Russian Federation –

Source: Saint Petersburg State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering –

An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.

Nikolai Tarbaev and Mikhail Frolov with the detachment's banner

February 17th marks Russian Student Team Day, a holiday established in 2004 to commemorate the founding of the youth organization "Russian Student Teams." On this day, it's customary to speak about the traditions, continuity, and significance of the student movement for the country. However, behind these words lie real human destinies and stories, one of which is connected to the All-Union Student Team "Druzhba," which included students from the Leningrad Civil Engineering Institute (LISI, as SPbGASU was then known).

In the spring of 1966, Tashkent experienced one of the most devastating earthquakes in its history. The city was only partially rebuilt: the center remained intact, while the adobe neighborhoods on the outskirts were completely destroyed. The entire country rallied to rebuild the capital of the Uzbek SSR—student brigades headed south alongside professional construction workers. Among them was a LISI detachment, dubbed "Tashkent-66."

Sixty years later, detachment members Mikhail Ivanovich Frolov and Nikolai Aleksandrovich Tarbaev returned to their native university to share their memories with current students.

From Leningrad to ruined Tashkent

Initially, the LISI student construction team was formed for a trip to Kazakhstan, but after the Tashkent earthquake, the decision was changed. Through the Komsomol, the team was urgently reoriented to reconstruction work in Central Asia.

"There were forty-three of us: thirty-seven boys and six girls," Nikolai Alexandrovich recalls. "We lived in army tents in the area known as the Bolgar Gardens. There was so much work that at first it was complete chaos."

Two months after the disaster, the students found themselves in a city where the destruction had not yet been fully cleared. In temperatures reaching 40 degrees Celsius, without established logistics or clear management, they were forced to literally rebuild their workflow from scratch.

Five meters by hand

The team's main task was to construct earthquake-resistant foundations for five-story apartment buildings. These involved enormous pits up to five meters deep, initially dug by hand with crowbars and shovels.

"First we dug, then we installed formwork and rebar, and poured concrete layer by layer," says Nikolai Tarbaev. "When the equipment arrived, things became a little easier, but we did the bulk of the work ourselves."

The work was hard, but it brought the team together. The students insisted on changing the work organization system: instead of disjointed "quotas," they proposed assigning permanent teams to specific sites. This proved to be a game-changer: the work became rhythmic, meaningful, and truly productive.

It was thanks to this that, in two months, the "Tashkentites" laid the foundations of a fifty-sixty-apartment building and completed a project that another unit had been unable to complete before them.

Heat, watermelons, and a feeling of a shoulder

Besides the grueling work, another side of that life remains in my memory: evening bonfires, songs, trips to the oriental bazaar, watermelons with which the merchants thanked the students for impromptu concerts.

"It wasn't just a job—it was a sense of celebration, youth, and being needed," says Mikhail Ivanovich. "You knew you were doing something important, and you were doing it with others."

When the mission ended, the team was asked to stay for another two weeks to finish the foundations left behind by their neighbors. They stayed. Then they returned to Leningrad on a special flight, with thanks, banners, and a welcome at the airport that the participants still remember.

The squad that didn't fall apart

But the most important consequence of "Tashkent-66" became apparent later: for many, this trip became a defining moment in their professional lives. The forty-three fighters grew into distinguished builders, heads of major construction organizations, and bridge builders. Entire families of engineers, architects, and designers emerged.

"Tashkent taught us how to work with people and be responsible for a common cause," Nikolai Tarbaev emphasizes. "After such a hard-working summer, you enter the profession no longer as a 'young specialist,' but as someone with life experience."

The detachment didn't disband even after graduation. At first, meetings were infrequent, then became regular. Today, the participants of "Tashkent-66" gather at least twice a year, including every year on May 9th, the anniversary of the detachment's formation. They published their own book of memories and preserved photographs, emblems, and traditions.

Memory that the future needs

The story of "Tashkent-66" isn't just a piece of the past. It's a conversation with current students about choosing a profession, about the path that shapes their entire lives.

"You've chosen the right path," Nikolai Tarbaev tells the students. "I sometimes think: if I were working in a pizzeria somewhere, what would I remember today? But as I drive around the city, I know: these bridges, these roads, these buildings are my work. We've chosen a profession that allows us to leave a mark on the earth."

According to Mikhail Frolov, "Being a builder isn't just a profession, it's a responsibility. It's an opportunity to create something that will outlast you. And university is the first step toward this great endeavor."

Tashkent-66 is more than just a post-earthquake construction project. It's an example of how choosing the right profession, an active student life, and working side by side can shape one's destiny and create lifelong friendships.

Please note: This information is raw content obtained directly from the source. It represents an accurate account of the source's assertions and does not necessarily reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

How accountants created writing

Translation. Region: Russian Federation –

Source: Novosibirsk State University –

An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.

Professor of the Department of Source Studies, Literature and Ancient Languages Humanitarian Institute NSU lecturer Oleg Donskikh discussed how humanity evolved from simple drawings and pictograms to the invention of the alphabet and fully developed writing, as well as the impact this had on our civilization. His lecture was part of the popular science marathon "Darwin Week", which is traditionally organized by Novosibirsk State University in February. This year, the event was held for the first time at the venue new campus of NSU.

People learned to draw before they invented the alphabet, but the drawings found in caves where ancient humans were stationed cannot be called writing, although they could have had a certain ritual significance.

"Writing is the term used to describe images that, in one way or another, reflect the language spoken by those who use these signs, and Stone Age rock art does not meet this criterion," explained Professor Donskikh.

Writing emerged somewhat later, independently in four centers: Mesopotamia and Egypt, China, and Mesoamerica. All modern writing systems, of which there are currently between one hundred and four hundred, according to various estimates, trace their roots to one of these centers.

The speaker demonstrated in detail how this process took place using the example of the ancient civilizations of the Middle East and Egypt, taking as a basis the hypothesis of the French-American researcher Denise Schmandt-Besser.

Beginning in the late 19th century, archaeologists explored virtually all of Mesopotamia. They unearthed the ruins of numerous settlements and assembled impressive collections of artifacts. Excavations at sites ranging from eastern Turkey to northern India yielded thousands of clay artifacts of unknown purpose. These were small figurines in the shape of cones, cylinders, and spheres, but their purpose remained a mystery for a long time.

Until the young archaeologist Schmandt-Besserat hypothesized in the 1970s that these were tokens for counting. This method of counting had been known since the Stone Age—the so-called one-to-one correspondence, or bijection. It's very simple: count something by comparing it to something else; for example, to count five sheep, you could use five sticks.

In Mesopotamia, clay objects were used to take this primitive method to an unprecedented level of sophistication. The shape and size of each artifact represented the type and quantity of various goods. In the agrarian economy of that era, such a system helped keep track of livestock and harvested crops. Tokens allowed for the calculation of the total inventory budget, served as a means of storing information about their quantities, and were used to verify the delivery of these goods to their destination.

Around 3100 BCE, Uruk, the ancient Sumerian city-state, experienced a qualitative leap: instead of storing clay tokens themselves in special clay "envelopes" imprinted with the tokens contained within, they began using the imprints themselves on clay tablets. Once this system became widespread and an understanding of what each individual image symbolized became universal, a logical question arose: why store clay tokens at all when it was easier to draw the desired symbol with a reed pen? Thus, the ancient system of three-dimensional counting objects evolved into a system of two-dimensional symbols. Consequently, a demand arose for people skilled in recording and processing information about goods in this manner.

"So writing emerged simultaneously with such a remarkable profession as accountant," Oleg Donskikh emphasized. "And, by the way, the first known recorded name, Kushim, belongs to an accountant."

The plaques contained not only information about the goods themselves, but also the names of those who owned them. They were written as follows: the name was divided into syllables, then each syllable was drawn with a symbol representing an object that sounded similar to it, with a note indicating that the reader was referring not to a collection of objects, but to parts of a name.

A major step in the development of writing occurred during the period when people began to build urban settlements, where social stratification increased significantly. Entire groups of people formed who used pictograms to convey information: merchants (traders), scribes (officials), and priests who recorded sacred texts.

To facilitate communication between large groups of people, a common set of symbols was needed. As symbols became more universal, their simplification followed. At the same time, it became clear that tokens were insufficient to convey all the necessary information. Furthermore, they could only describe objects, but not abstract concepts.

To solve this problem, people followed the same approach as when writing the names of the owners of goods on tally tablets, using symbols for monosyllabic objects, supplied with a determinative (a special sign indicating that the sound, not the meaning, is important here).

“Phoneticization is the main tool that ultimately led to the emergence of writing in the sense that we understand it,” the scientist explained.

Thus was born the famous cuneiform script, now considered one of the world's first writing systems. It was quite complex and was taught in specialized scribe schools. As Oleg Donskikh noted, these schools taught not only writing but also other disciplines and skills required by officials.

The teaching of writing itself was based on specialized canonical texts, which can already be considered literary. But literature proper also emerged, most notably the Epic of Gilgamesh, considered one of humanity's first literary works.

A couple of centuries later, writing emerged in Egypt in a similar fashion (for this reason, many researchers don't consider it a separate center of writing, but rather view it in conjunction with Mesopotamia, which influenced the Egyptians). However, the Egyptians did not copy cuneiform, but created their own system, better known today as hieroglyphs, although for everyday purposes they used the simpler demotic script.

Later civilizations that emerged in the Middle East developed their own writing systems based on these two ancient systems, but they also introduced their own innovations. For example, the Phoenicians were the first to invent an alphabet, which in turn gave rise to the Greek alphabet (still well known today), as well as the Aramaic syllabic script, which was widely used in ancient times. It's worth noting that Aramaic was widely spoken in the Middle East and was the language spoken by Jesus Christ.

Some writing systems evolved and gave rise to new ones, while others, conversely, disappeared. Oleg Donskikh cited the Minoan script of Ancient Crete as an example of the latter.

The Minoan culture was renowned for its complex architecture (just think of the famous palace of Knossos), art, and the creation of exquisite objects. But their most enigmatic achievement was Linear A, which remains undeciphered to this day. All that scholars know about it today is that it is a writing system consisting of approximately 75 symbols, each symbol representing a syllable.

"The fact is that this script wasn't widespread; it was used by the kings of Crete for their own purposes, and it was taught to a very limited circle of people in special schools. And when this civilization collapsed after the volcanic eruption on Santorini, which caused a tsunami and ashfall, and the subsequent Achaean invasion, its writing rules vanished into oblivion, along with their elite speakers," explained Oleg Donskikh.

In the final section of his lecture, Professor Oleg Donskikh cited a quote from Plato, who considered writing not a human achievement, but rather a folly or a vice. "Anyone with intelligence will never dare to express in words what is the fruit of their own reflection, especially in such an inflexible form as written symbols," the famous philosopher said, believing that the texts that emerged in his era destroyed the most valuable aspect of the teacher-student bond and imparted valuable knowledge to the ignorant, who were in no way worthy of it and were incapable of understanding it, only distorting it.

Nevertheless, writing continued to develop and became one of the cornerstones of virtually every civilization. And today, few except specialists know that it all began with inventory control in the settlements of the ancient inhabitants of Mesopotamia, the land of the Near East.

Please note: This information is raw content obtained directly from the source. It represents an accurate account of the source's assertions and does not necessarily reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

"His work is more like icon painting": 195 years since the birth of Nikolai Leskov

Translation. Region: Russian Federation –

Source: Official website of the State –

An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.

Nikolai Leskov was born on February 16, 1831, in the village of Gorokhovo in the Oryol district. His mother belonged to a noble family, and his father, a member of the clergy, broke with her and joined the Oryol Criminal Chamber, where he received hereditary nobility. According to contemporaries, he gained a reputation as a perceptive investigator, capable of solving complex cases.

Early years and finding one's calling

The writer spent his childhood in Oryol. His grandmother had a profound influence on him, instilling moral values and compassion. After his father retired, the family moved to the village of Panino. There, the future writer first encountered the local people—an experience that later formed the basis for his novella "Yudol," about a terrible famine and crimes committed for the sake of survival.

Leskov's studies at the gymnasium, which he entered at age 10, were unsuccessful: due to neglect and a dislike of cramming, after five years he had only completed two grades. In 1847, he began serving in the Oryol Chamber of the Criminal Court, then transferred to Kyiv. In Kyiv, he became an auditor at the university, developed a passion for icon painting, participated in a student society, and interacted with pilgrims and Old Believers.

After leaving the military in 1857, Nikolai began working for his relatives' company, Schott & Wilkens. His business trips often took him around the country, introducing him to new places, languages, cultures, and traditions.

"I know the Russian people to their very core, and I don't take any credit for it. I didn't learn about the people from conversations with St. Petersburg cabbies, but I grew up among the people…" the writer would later share.

During this period of his life, Leskov took up the pen for the first time.

The beginning of a writing career and criticism

Leskov's literary career began with "Essays on the Distilling Industry," published in Otechestvennye Zapiski in 1861. In 1862, he became a regular contributor to the newspaper Severnaya Pchela (Northern Bee). However, his articles accusing the government of inaction during the St. Petersburg fires angered Alexander II, and the editors sent Nicholas on an extended business trip to Europe.

In 1863, Leskov returned to Russia, and soon wrote "The Life of a Woman" and "Nowhere to Go," both published in the journal "Biblioteka." The latter work provoked a sharp critical reaction, and the novel sealed the writer's place in the creative community for many years to come, as he was accused of holding anti-democratic, "reactionary" views.

A significant milestone in his writing was the novel "At Daggers Drawn." In it, the author condemned nihilism and nascent revolutionary movements. According to Maxim Gorky, "…after the evil novel, Leskov's literary work immediately becomes a vibrant painting, or rather, an icon painting—he begins to create for Russia an iconostasis of its saints and righteous."

The Tale of the Cross-Eyed Lefty from Tula and the Steel Flea

One of Leskov's most famous works is "Lefty." This tale, a skaz (a folktale), is unique due to its writing style, which beautifully captures the richness and color of Russian folk speech. Opinions on the work have been wildly varied: some praise the interesting plot, the author's style, and the moral, while others believe the characters lack emotion.

Leskov himself wrote: "Several others agreed that in my stories it is truly difficult to distinguish between good and evil, and that at times it's even impossible to discern who is harming the cause and who is helping it. This was attributed to a certain innate treachery in my nature."

Interesting facts about "Lefty"

Lefty is a collective image of talent, patience, and the tragic Russian fate. Leskov himself admitted: "Where 'Lefty' stands, one should read 'Russian people.'" Nikolai got the idea while vacationing in Sestroretsk, from Colonel Bolonin, an employee of the arms factory. There, he first heard the story of the English steel flea, which Russian craftsmen were able not only to copy but also to shoe. Leo Tolstoy did not understand Lefty. He found the language strange, and the "tricky words" unpopular. The first edition of Lefty was unsuccessful. The opening title with the angels and the engraving of the grasshopper at the end had no relation to the content, and therefore seemed out of place. Leskov wrote down the words for the tale, overheard from ordinary people, in a "little book." Some vocabulary was rewritten by the printer, who considered the author illiterate.

Although this work didn't enjoy great recognition during Nikolai Semyonovich's lifetime, it later became an enduring classic. It's not just a tale about a Russian craftsman, but a true chronicle, combining a rich, complex history and characters.

Besides "Lefty," the "pearls" of his work were the story about a merchant's wife, whose criminal passion leads to the tragedy "Lady Macbeth of the Mtsensk District" (1864) and the wandering novel "The Enchanted Wanderer" (1873) – the story of a runaway serf who experienced wanderings, captivity, war, but retained faith and readiness for self-sacrifice.

Leskov's works are memorable for their unique style and vibrant, expressive characters. The author created a unified literary and stylistic framework—the tale—and the image of a Russian man who lives by his conscience, modestly yet masterfully performing his work. His closeness to the people, their everyday life, and their customs continues to make his work so relevant today.

Subscribe to the "Our GUU" Telegram channel. Publication date: February 16, 2026.

Please note: This information is raw content obtained directly from the source. It represents an accurate account of the source's assertions and does not necessarily reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

The transition to a unified system of higher education was discussed at the III Non-State Education Forum.

Translation. Region: Russian Federation –

Source: Official website of the State –

An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.

On February 16, Vladimir Stroyev, Rector of the State University of Management, took part in the III Forum of Non-State Education.

The main topics of discussion were new digital technologies, increasing interaction with employers, and improving the quality of the educational process.

The program began with a plenary session, "On Strategic Directions for the Development of Private Education," featuring presentations by Minister of Science and Higher Education Valery Falkov, Chairman of the Liberal Democratic Party of Russia Leonid Slutsky, Chairperson of the Association of Non-State Education Lyubov Dukhanina, President of the Synergy Corporation Vadim Lobov, Deputy Head of Rosobrnadzor Svetlana Kochetova, and First Vice President of Opora Rossii Eduard Omarov.

Lyubov Dukhanina read a letter of welcome on behalf of Andrei Fursenko, Assistant to the President of the Russian Federation.

In his speech, Valery Falkov noted that higher education is facing unprecedented challenges: unemployment is at a record low, but at the same time, there is a shortage of qualified personnel in many areas. This indicates the need to change approaches, including to university admissions and updating educational programs.

The Minister of Education and Science also announced a transition to a unified system of higher education, which will replace the current division between bachelor's and specialist's degrees, with the length of study dependent on the complexity of the profession and employer demands. The minister also focused on reforming the master's program, proposing to divide it into three types: research, professional, and managerial. Admission will be based on specialized exams rather than general education subjects.

Lyubov Dukhanina, Chair of the Association of Non-State Education, also noted the relevance of the trend toward high-quality education and unique skills. She noted that employers today are looking for highly specialized professionals capable of multitasking, as well as managers who can assemble a team of such specialists and lead them to achieve their plans. The speaker emphasized that people are willing to pay for a quality education from an early age, as evidenced by the increased demand for private kindergartens and schools with engaging, relevant educational programs, which creates new challenges for the education system itself and its transformation.

Eduard Omarov shared his opinion that the most in-demand talent in the country today is entrepreneurs, who make a significant contribution to the national economy. They, in turn, need competent managers and senior executives who will focus on developing specific areas: marketing, production, human resources, and so on.

Following the plenary session, a meeting of the Expert Council on Education and Youth Policy under Deputy Chairman of the State Duma of the Russian Federation Boris Chernyshov was held.

Olga Petrova, Deputy Minister of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation, joined the meeting via videoconference. She spoke about the development of the Economic Youth Entrepreneurial University, support for student startups and educational programs aimed at creating them, technological entrepreneurship, and social initiatives.

The meeting participants discussed the development of regional education systems, entrepreneurship in universities, and international cooperation in higher education, as well as education within the framework of the Strategy for the Development of Education in Russia until 2036.

Subscribe to the "Our GUU" Telegram channel. Publication date: February 16, 2026.

Please note: This information is raw content obtained directly from the source. It represents an accurate account of the source's assertions and does not necessarily reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

Polytechnic University and JSC VTI have agreed to cooperate in science, education, and high technology.

Translation. Region: Russian Federation –

Source: Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University –

An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.

Andrey Rudskoy, Rector of Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, and Ivan Boltenkov, Director General of the All-Russian Thermal Engineering Institute (JSC VTI), signed a cooperation agreement aimed at integrating scientific and educational potential and jointly implementing Russia's state scientific and technological policy.

The agreement provides for long-term and systematic cooperation in science, education, and high technology. The key goal of the partnership is to develop highly qualified human resources and create conditions for training specialists in demand in the energy and related sectors.

The document covers a wide range of areas. JSC VTI and SPbPU plan to jointly develop and implement educational and research programs in priority areas of science and technology, build an innovative infrastructure, and develop experimental and instrumentation capabilities. Particular emphasis is placed on import substitution and technological development, including through the unification of the engineering competencies, research base, and educational resources of the country's two leading scientific schools.

Our collaboration will focus on developing additive technologies in the energy sector. Furthermore, we will jointly develop technologies for producing hydrogen from solid fuel. We will also conduct joint educational activities and train personnel for the energy industry, including postgraduate research fellows," noted SPbPU Rector Andrey Rudskoy.

As noted in the agreement, joint initiatives are aimed at developing competitive master's and doctoral programs, as well as continuing education programs. These programs will be tailored to the real needs of the energy industry and will focus on training specialists capable of working with modern and advanced technologies. Measures to enhance the academic and professional mobility of researchers, faculty, graduate students, and undergraduates are also envisaged.

For VTI, consolidating efforts with leading engineering universities is the foundation for sustainable development in the industry. Combining our Institute's scientific school with the educational potential of the Polytechnic University allows us to closely align personnel training with real-world energy challenges and lay the groundwork for technological sovereignty, emphasized Ivan Boltenkov, CEO of JSC VTI.

A separate area of cooperation will be the organization and holding of joint scientific events—conferences, seminars, schools, and roundtables, including those involving young scientists and students. These formats are designed to facilitate the exchange of experience and the development of competencies among participants. The result will be the development of a professional community and the intellectual potential of the country.

Thus, the agreement lays the foundation for a sustainable partnership between JSC VTI and SPbPU and is of strategic importance for improving the domestic energy sector.

Reference: The All-Russian Heat Engineering Institute (JSC VTI) is a leading research center founded in 1921. It has been awarded two Orders of the Red Banner of Labor for its achievements in the energy sector. Its CEO is Ivan Boltenkov.

The Institute plays a vital role in the development of the Russian energy sector, conducting fundamental and applied research, design, and testing for the country's energy companies. It is a national center for excellence and training of highly qualified personnel.

VTI's scientific potential is concentrated in nine research departments and 22 laboratories, covering the entire spectrum of thermal power engineering—from the commissioning and operation of power plants to the implementation of digital and environmentally innovative technologies. The institute has extensive experience developing regulatory and technical documentation, creating industry standards, and implementing thousands of R&D projects.

Please note: This information is raw content obtained directly from the source. It represents an accurate account of the source's assertions and does not necessarily reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

SPbGASU and NGASU (SibStrIn) are expanding their cooperation in the field of construction technology and organization.

Translation. Region: Russian Federation –

Source: Saint Petersburg State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering –

An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.

Lecturer of the Department of Technology and Organization of Construction at NSUACE Roman Kotkov, Vladimir Molodin and Roman Motylev

The period between the winter exam session for part-time students and the start of the spring semester for full-time students is traditionally considered a time of relative calm. However, for the faculty and research departments of SPbGASU, it often becomes particularly intense and productive. The end of January was marked by an important professional meeting in the field of "Construction Technology and Organization" (TOS).

A constructive and creative meeting was held in Novosibirsk between Roman Motylev, Head of the Department of Construction Organization at SPbGASU, Candidate of Technical Sciences, and Associate Professor, and Vladimir Molodin, Vice-Rector for Research at the Novosibirsk State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering (SibStrIn), Head of the Department of Construction Technology and Organization, Doctor of Technical Sciences, and Professor.

During the visit, the colleagues visited Technonicol's research center and the Knauf-NGASU (SibStrIn) Consulting Center, which showcases modern, innovative finishing and roofing technologies. Of particular interest was NGASU's collaboration with PERI, a global manufacturer of formwork and scaffolding, as part of the "Universities" project, which aims to integrate advanced manufacturing solutions into the educational process.

One of the key areas of work for the SPbGASU Department of TOS is improving construction methods in extreme climatic conditions. The department's research enables efficient construction and ensures the reliable operation of buildings and structures at subzero temperatures. The department operates a laboratory for studying winter concreting processes, creating a solid scientific and experimental foundation for further research.

The meeting resulted in agreements to expand cooperation between the universities. The parties expressed their willingness to participate in research and practical conferences, exchange experiences in organizing the educational process and implementing research projects, and participate in dissertation review and serve as leading organizations.

The development of partnerships between SPbGASU and NGASU (SibStrIn) opens up new opportunities for strengthening scientific schools and training highly qualified specialists in the field of construction technology and organization.

Please note: This information is raw content obtained directly from the source. It represents an accurate account of the source's assertions and does not necessarily reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

A Rosatom enterprise opened a School of Mathematical Modeling at Novosibirsk State University.

Translation. Region: Russian Federation –

Source: Novosibirsk State University –

An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.

On February 16, 2026, the opening of the Modeling School of the Joint-Stock Company Engineering and Technical Center JET (JSC ETC JET, part of JSC Rosatom Service) took place at Novosibirsk State University (NSU).

Rosatom places special emphasis on training qualified personnel and supporting the comprehensive development of young people, including in engineering and mathematics. Established at the country's leading technical universities, the JET Engineering and Technology Center's Modeling Schools immerse final-year students in mathematical modeling and develop digital competencies relevant to the IT market.

Training at the Modeling School is based on the domestic innovative platform for mathematical modeling and digital twin creation, REPEAT (developed by JSC ITC JET). The Modeling School will provide comprehensive training for engineers in digital modeling.

"Creating our own modern developments and innovations for industry, training highly qualified specialists in technology and mathematics, and developing centers of excellence—these and other objectives for strengthening Russia's technological sovereignty are our goals as we expand the School of Modeling network. We believe that active and motivated NSU students—future graduates of the School of Modeling—will join the growing ranks of professionals capable of solving problems of national importance," noted Sergey Bukreev, Director of JET LAB.

As part of our development strategy, the university aims to strengthen the participation of industrial partners in educational projects. This helps us train specialists who, even during their studies, are immersed in the real industry environment, participating in projects and solving problems initiated by companies. Rosatom State Corporation is one of the university's key industrial partners. Since 2024, we have been working with a joint program. Master's program "Digital Twins and Scientific Engineering" on Faculty of Mechanics and Mathematics"The opening of the Modeling School marks a new and important stage in our collaboration. I am confident that this will open up additional opportunities for our students," commented NSU Rector and Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences Dmitry Pyshny.

The School of Modeling at RSU has joined the growing network of engineering and mathematical schools of JSC "ITC "JET": students from KSPEU (Kazan), TPU (Tomsk), DSTU (Rostov-on-Don), KubSTU (Krasnodar), MPEI (Moscow), UrFU (Yekaterinburg), RSU (Moscow), and LETI (St. Petersburg) are already learning the basics of mathematical modeling on REPEAT.

Please note: This information is raw content obtained directly from the source. It represents an accurate account of the source's assertions and does not necessarily reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

NSU shooters win bronze medals at the Spartakiad

Translation. Region: Russian Federation –

Source: Novosibirsk State University –

An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.

The NSU team took third place in the shooting competition as part of the "Cheerfulness and Health" Spartakiad among faculty and staff of higher education institutions of the Novosibirsk Region! The program included air rifle and air pistol shooting, and our team included the following: Anastasia Trishkina, senior lecturer at the Faculty of Physical Culture and Sport (KafPhV), took second place in the individual rifle shooting event; Anastasia Korobeyshchikova, commodity expert; Anton Pivovarov, senior lecturer at the Faculty of Physical Culture and Sport (KafPhV); Vladimir Dmitrievsky, senior lecturer at the Institute of Physical Culture and Sport (IPP); Olga Chernaya, senior lecturer at the Faculty of Physical Culture and Sport (KafPhV); Sergey Timofeev, associate professor at the Faculty of Physical Culture and Sport (KafPhV); Evgeny Korolev, head of the Institute of Physical Culture and Sport (IPP) facilities department

Our team took 5th place in the table tennis competition.

Team members: Yuri Efremenko – Senior Lecturer, MMC; Larisa Zelenkina – Senior Lecturer, Department of Philosophy; Alexander Byvaltsev – Associate Professor, FENO; Leg Danilov – Senior Lecturer, Department of Higher Mathematics; Denis Kurilkin – Senior Lecturer, Department of Mathematics

Congratulations to the NSU team on their bronze medal in shooting! We thank everyone for participating in the interuniversity competition and wish them continued success in their sport.

Please note: This information is raw content obtained directly from the source. It represents an accurate account of the source's assertions and does not necessarily reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

A student from St. Petersburg State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering presented his own methodology for transport reform at an international conference.

Translation. Region: Russian Federation –

Source: Saint Petersburg State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering –

An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.

Ivan Beshentsev at the conference

Ivan Beshentsev, a fourth-year student at the Automobile and Road Construction Faculty of St. Petersburg State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering, took part in the 84th International Scientific, Methodological and Research Conference of the Moscow Automobile and Road Construction State Technical University (MADI).

Ivan spoke at the session "Development of Sustainable Urban Transport Systems at the International and National Levels: Challenges and Opportunities." Experts from Rosavtotrans, Rostransnadzor, JSC Mostransniiproekt, and other relevant organizations participated in the session. The second part of the meeting was devoted to presentations by students and young scientists. A representative of St. Petersburg State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering presented a paper on "Transport Reform: A Scientific and Practical Interpretation from the Perspectives of Passengers and Enterprises."

The research methodology is based on a comprehensive scientific and practical approach, presented in the form of an architectural pyramid. From bottom to top, the model includes a structural and geographical analysis of the settlement, urban belt and sector, infrastructure, transport hubs, corridors, and route network, as well as an assessment of the socioeconomic impact. This approach allows us to consider the transportation system as a holistic architecture, where each level influences the next.

Based on this analysis, the transport system is assessed from two key perspectives: passenger and carrier. The report proposed a framework for balancing the interests of these transport stakeholders, taking into account speed and regularity, stop density, route network structure, rolling stock selection, fare policy parameters, and the population's solvency. Particular attention was paid to the development of common reference materials and indicators for assessing transport reforms, enabling a systematic approach to rolling stock renewal, infrastructure development, and ticket menu development.

Ivan's interest in this topic arose in 2025 during research trips to Russian cities—Kaluga, Cheboksary, Perm, and Chelyabinsk. During these trips, he developed projects aimed at improving the quality of public transportation services. At the end of 2024, the student conceived the idea of expanding his research and formulating his own scientific methodology. Following the recommendation of Alexey Terentyev, a Doctor of Engineering and Professor at the State University of Management and formerly of St. Petersburg State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering, the methodology was systematized into an architectural model. Taking into account the practical experience gained in Moscow, as well as his experience communicating with heads of departments and ministries of transportation in various cities, a report was prepared and presented at the conference.

Ivan Beshentsev plans to further refine the methodology for his PhD dissertation. His final thesis will use it to calculate the need for tram and trolleybus line development in various cities. While the student has previously published numerous transport survey materials in scientific journals, his original methodology has not yet been published.

In preparing his report, Ivan Beshentsev consulted with Evgeny Vlasov, Deputy Director of Transportation Organization and Transport Management at the Saint Petersburg State Unitary Enterprise Gorelektrotrans, as well as with his academic advisor, Aleksandr Figichev, Senior Lecturer in the Department of Transport Systems and Road and Bridge Construction at the Automobile and Highway Faculty of Saint Petersburg State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering.

According to Ivan, research on transport reforms has not previously been so comprehensive. The material presented was well received by the audience and received high praise from the section chairs—Vadim Donchenko, PhD in Engineering and Associate Professor at the Russian University of Transport (RUT (MIIT)) and Alexander Solodkiy, Doctor of Economics and Professor at St. Petersburg State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering (SPbGASU), who noted the importance of a comprehensive approach to transport system design.

"The presentation lasted no more than 11 minutes, with the main discussion taking place behind the scenes. During the presentation, I was able to organize the material by the levels of the transport system—a task aided by the pyramid-shaped architecture. The audience was pleasantly surprised by the research's coverage of both theoretical and practical aspects of transport reform. Synthesizing theory and practice in the face of uncertainty is one of the key challenges in urban development today, in the areas of urban planning and transport," the student noted.

The topic of the report also attracted the interest of Sultan Zhankaziev, Doctor of Engineering Sciences and Professor, Head of the Department of Road Traffic Organization and Safety at MADI. He suggested Ivan discuss his final qualifying work as a startup during the summer and the prospects for further scientific research.

SPbGASU wishes Ivan Beshentsev further professional success and new scientific achievements!

Please note: This information is raw content obtained directly from the source. It represents an accurate account of the source's assertions and does not necessarily reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.