Category: Транспорт

Translation. Region: Russian Federation –

Source: KMZ Cargo – KMZ CARGO –

An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.

New FSTEC and FSB regulations may block the use of foreign algorithms for analyzing cargo flows, predicting equipment wear, and managing warehouses, as they will be deemed unsafe.

Russia may introduce mandatory certification of AI systems for critical infrastructure and government agencies, RBC reports.

The authorities have prepared a bill that will, for the first time, introduce differentiated regulation for artificial intelligence systems based on their risk level. Mandatory certification by the Federal Service for Technical and Export Control (FSTEC) and the Federal Security Service (FSB) is planned for AI systems used in critical information infrastructure (CII) facilities and in public administration. This follows from the draft law "On the Use of Artificial Intelligence Systems by Agencies Part of the Unified System of Public Authority," a copy of which RBC has obtained.

According to the document, all AI systems will be divided into four risk categories: minimal, limited, high, and critical. High-risk systems will be those used in critical information infrastructure (CII) facilities—communication networks, energy, transportation, finance, and other significant industries. Critical risk implies a threat to life, health, or national security. It is for these two categories that a mandatory certificate of compliance will be required. The new National AI Center for Public Administration will determine the criticality level of each system and maintain a registry of approved solutions.

RBC has learned that testing of high- and critical-risk AI systems is planned for a special testing facility being established at the initiative of the Ministry of Digital Development. Successful completion of the tests will be a prerequisite for approval for use on critical information infrastructure (CI) facilities. Furthermore, the bill explicitly prohibits the use of AI systems with rights held by foreign entities on such infrastructure. The authors intend this to ensure technological sovereignty and protect against the risk of data leaks. A Ministry of Digital Development spokesperson, however, declined to comment on the details, stating only that the ministry is "not currently developing legislation" related to such a testing facility.

Market experts have varying assessments of the initiative's potential implications. On the one hand, the need to protect critical assets is undeniable. As Pavel Rastopshin, CEO of Ultimatek Group, notes, AI is currently frequently used in the energy, transportation, and housing and utilities sectors for predictive analytics, load management, and accident prevention, often based on solutions from international vendors such as Siemens or Schneider Electric. The idea of certification for such systems is understandable, but, according to him, there is currently no real mechanism for certifying neural networks with unpredictable behavior. "It cannot be tested for all situations, which means security cannot be guaranteed using traditional methods," Rastopshin noted. He admits that regulators may face a dilemma: either impose a restrictive regime, freezing digitalization, or seek fundamentally new approaches to regulation.

On the other hand, a strict ban on foreign AI solutions raises questions about practical implementation and potential costs. Vitaly Popov, Director of the Softline Solutions Department, points out that many companies have already integrated foreign systems into their processes, including open-source models (LR). Abruptly abandoning them could paralyze workflows. "This is a step backwards in terms of development… Many companies are already using foreign AI solutions… Will we be able to transition to Russian solutions without losses?" the expert asks. He also emphasizes that most domestic AI developments are built on architectures derived from global open source, so a legal ban will not eliminate technological dependence but merely limit access to the most mature models.

Denis Romanov, Director of the Lukomorye AI Product Development Center (part of Rostelecom), points out that not all foreign solutions are equally risky. Open-source models like Llama or Mistral can be deployed locally and, if trained on domestic data and with controlled updates, used with minimal risk. He believes the key factor is not the architecture's origin, but control over the entire chain: deployment, data, and updates.

At the same time, there are also warnings about the potential negative consequences of overly strict regulation for the emerging market. Dmitry Markov, CEO of VisionLabs (MTS), believes that strict measures at the initial stage of AI development could hinder technological progress, reduce the competitiveness of Russian developers, and trigger an outflow of qualified personnel.

As a reminder, Russia ranked 28th out of 36 countries in the Global AI Vibrancy Tool for 2024. Its strong legislative position contrasts with weak implementation and low research citation rates. LR

Read more:http://logirus.ru/nevs/infrastructure/your_and_or_someone else’s_upcoming_certification_to put an end to_on_foreign_neural networks.html

Publication date: 02/11/2026

Please note; this information is raw content obtained directly from the information source. It is an accurate account of what the source claims, and does not necessarily reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

Translation. Region: Russian Federation –

Source: KMZ Cargo – KMZ CARGO –

An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.

The rules abolish the practice of resealing at EAEU borders, introducing a unified digital system. Responsibility for providing the seal lies with the customer, with violations subject to fines starting in the second quarter of 2026, as well as the measures already in place for sanctioned goods.

On February 11, 2026, a mandatory EAEU agreement on the use of electronic navigation seals for international road transport will come into force. A key change is that a single seal installed in the country where tracking begins will be valid for the entire route across the Union's countries, without needing to be replaced at borders. This means that a seal installed, for example, in Belarus will accompany a truck across Russia to its final destination in Kazakhstan. There will no longer be a need to replace the device at borders, as all national operators are integrated into a single system and exchange data, explained Maxim Demenchuk, Commercial Director of the CRCP.

The new requirements will be introduced in stages. During the first stage, starting on February 11, monitoring will apply to the transportation of sanctioned goods, alcohol, and tobacco products under customs transit, export, and mutual trade procedures. Additionally, road transport will be required to secure a customs seal for light industry and electronic goods from approved lists.

The second stage, scheduled for July 31, 2026, will expand the rules to cover all customs transit of any goods transported by road. An important clarification: the agreement applies only to shipments that involve the territories of two or more EAEU countries. Domestic Russian routes are not covered by these rules, clarified Maxim Demenchuk.

To get started, carriers, freight forwarders, or shippers must register in their personal account on the CRCP website, create a shipping request, and pay for the service. The system will automatically calculate the rate in rubles for the entire route, regardless of the number of countries crossed. Payment is made to the operator in the country where the tracking begins, who then independently settles with their colleagues in other countries.

The company declares its technological readiness for change. The CRCP electronic seal fleet comprises 23,000 devices, with plans to increase this number by 30% by 2026. A network of over 150 temporary storage warehouses and 138 Platon system offices has been deployed across Russia, where devices can be installed or removed. A 24-hour support line is already operational. In the event of an emergency en route, such as a damaged seal, the driver must immediately notify the operator via the hotline.

The expert paid special attention to liability issues. Serious penalties, including re-exportation or destruction of the goods, are already in place for failure to use seals on sanctioned goods. Starting in the second quarter of 2026, Russia is expected to introduce administrative fines for violations under the EAEU agreement. Meanwhile, the current Union State Decree No. 7, which regulates import controls from third countries, will remain in effect alongside the new agreement. This means that direct imports, for example, from China to Russia, will remain subject to the old rules for certain categories of goods.

In the case of consolidated cargo, if the shipment contains at least one piece of regulated goods, the entire vehicle may be sealed, clarified Maxim Demenchuk. Special procedures for removing and re-sealing seals will apply for shipments to the Kaliningrad Region through third countries. The device must be returned within three calendar days to the operator in the country where the shipment ends or to any Centralized Regional Control Center (CRCC) collection point.

Contact information for all national operators, including Beltamozhservice in Belarus and the Institute of Space Technology and Engineering (ISTE) in Kazakhstan, is available on the CRCP website in a special information sheet for carriers.

As a reminder, the electronic navigation seal system will be integrated with the GIS EPD, giving carriers the freedom to choose devices from different operators. These plans were confirmed by Artem Popov, CEO of the Digital Platform Development Center, speaking at the Transport Week 2025 forum. LR

Read more:http://logirus.ru/nevs/custom_and_ved/seal_with_passport_EAS_one_seal_for_the_entire_route_through_the_union.html

Publication date: 02/11/2026

Please note; this information is raw content obtained directly from the information source. It is an accurate account of what the source claims, and does not necessarily reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.