Translation. Region: Russian Federation –
Source: People's Republic of China in Russian – People's Republic of China in Russian –
An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.
Source: People's Republic of China – State Council News
Beijing, October 24 (Xinhua) — To maintain peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait, it is necessary to adhere to the one-China principle and firmly oppose separatist activities aimed at achieving "Taiwan independence," Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun said on Friday.
Guo Jiakun made the statement at a regular press briefing in response to a question about German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul's comments regarding the one-China principle in an interview.
The official representative noted that there is only one China in the world, and Taiwan is part of it. The government of the People's Republic of China is the sole legitimate government representing all of China. "This is the most complete, accurate, and only true definition of the one-China principle. Any other interpretation is unacceptable," he stated.
According to the Chinese diplomat, the greatest threat to peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait comes from separatist activities to achieve "Taiwan independence" and from the connivance and support of external forces.
Guo Jiakun emphasized that maintaining peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait requires strict adherence to the one-China principle and resolute opposition to separatist activities seeking "Taiwan independence." Those who merely call for maintaining the status quo but fail to oppose "Taiwan independence" are, in fact, condoning separatist actions that undermine peace and stability in the Strait, the official representative emphasized.
“We hope that Germany will strictly adhere to the one-China principle and categorically oppose separatist activities to achieve ‘Taiwan independence,’” he concluded. –0–
Please note: This information is raw content obtained directly from the source. It represents an accurate account of the source's assertions and does not necessarily reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.