Translation. Region: Russian Federation –
Source: People's Republic of China in Russian – People's Republic of China in Russian –
An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.
Source: People's Republic of China – State Council News
Dushanbe, October 23 /Xinhua/ — A roundtable discussion on "Results of the Tianjin Summit: The SCO as a Platform for Joint Development and Global Governance" was held at the Academy of Public Administration under the President of Tajikistan on Wednesday.
The event was held jointly by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Tajikistan, the Academy of Public Administration under the President of Tajikistan, the Embassy of China, and the SCO Friendship and Cooperation Center in Tajikistan.
In his opening remarks, Davron Jurakhon Safarzoda, Rector of the Academy of Public Administration under the President of Tajikistan and Director of the SCO Friendship and Cooperation Center in Tajikistan, emphasized that the SCO Summit in Tianjin was the largest and most meaningful in the organization's history. He stated that the summit's results confirm that "the SCO is confidently moving toward its 25th anniversary as a mature, strategically oriented international organization, capable of formulating goals for the decade ahead—from security and stability to sustainable development and humanitarian cooperation."
The rector also noted that “in the context of increasing geopolitical fragmentation and a crisis of trust in international affairs, the value of platforms based on dialogue, equality, and mutual respect is particularly growing,” emphasizing that the SCO is rightfully one of such authoritative and effective international platforms today.
The round table was attended by ambassadors extraordinary and plenipotentiary of the SCO member states, representatives of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Tajikistan, representatives of the scientific community and the expert community, as well as representatives of the media. –0–
Please note: This information is raw content obtained directly from the source. It represents an accurate account of the source's assertions and does not necessarily reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.