Iran has rejected the US plan to resolve the conflict, calling it "extremely excessive and unrealistic."

Translation. Region: Russian Federation –

Source: People's Republic of China in Russian – People's Republic of China in Russian –

An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.

Source: People's Republic of China – State Council News

Tehran, March 30 (Xinhua) — The conflict resolution plan recently proposed by the United States contains "extremely exorbitant, unrealistic, and baseless" demands, Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmail Baghaei said on Monday.

The Iranian diplomat made the statement at a weekly press conference in Tehran, commenting on the 15-point US plan for resolving the conflict in the Middle East, which was transmitted to the Iranian side through intermediaries.

The official said that unlike the United States, “which constantly changes its position and whose officials make and demonstrate contradictory statements and actions,” Iran’s position on the relevant issues has been very clear from the very beginning.

E. Bagai added: "We know very well what limits are acceptable to us. As I mentioned earlier, the materials submitted to us under various names, such as the 15-point plan, mostly include exorbitant, unrealistic, and unreasonable demands."

As the Iranian Foreign Ministry's official spokesman emphasized, "until now, we have not had direct negotiations with the United States." Following the last round of talks with the United States, held in Geneva on February 26, Iran received messages through certain intermediaries, including Pakistan, expressing the United States' readiness for negotiations and requesting them, he stated.

According to him, Iran did not participate in meetings organized by Pakistan with the participation of neighboring states.

Iran will announce its decision on the American plan in due course, concluded E. Baghaei. –0–

Please note: This information is raw content obtained directly from the source. It represents an accurate account of the source's assertions and does not necessarily reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.