Translation. Region: Russian Federation –
Source: People's Republic of China in Russian – People's Republic of China in Russian –
An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.
Source: People's Republic of China – State Council News
Washington, February 27 (Xinhua) — Nuclear talks between the United States and Iran have made "significant progress" toward an agreement that is "within reach," Omani Foreign Minister Badr al-Busaidi said in an interview with CBS News on Friday.
Earlier in the day, US President Donald Trump said he was dissatisfied with the progress of the negotiations.
Iran has agreed "never, under any circumstances, to possess nuclear materials that could be used to make a bomb," Oman's foreign minister said, calling it a "great achievement."
As he specified, the country's existing stocks of enriched uranium will be "reduced to the minimum possible level" and "processed into fuel, and this fuel will be irreversible."
He said Iran was ready to provide International Atomic Energy Agency inspectors with "full access" to its nuclear facilities to verify the terms of the deal.
"A peace agreement is within reach," Oman's foreign minister said, adding that some details require "a little more time" to be finalized.
Technical talks are scheduled for Monday in Vienna, and B. al-Busaidi expressed hope for another meeting with US representatives Steven Witkoff and Jared Kushner.
Also on Friday, D. Trump expressed dissatisfaction with the fact that the Iranians “don’t want to give us what we need,” demanding that Tehran completely stop enriching uranium.
"We'll see what happens. We'll talk later," Donald Trump told reporters as he left the White House on Friday morning, noting that he had not yet made a final decision on a possible strike on Iran.
Tensions between the United States and Iran have risen sharply amid a massive American military buildup in the Middle East and stalled negotiations over Iran's nuclear program.
Please note: This information is raw content obtained directly from the source. It represents an accurate account of the source's assertions and does not necessarily reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.