Contracts worth over 10 billion yuan were signed at the 2nd China-Russia Economic and Trade Conference in Tongjiang.

Translation. Region: Russian Federation –

Source: People's Republic of China in Russian – People's Republic of China in Russian –

An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.

Source: People's Republic of China – State Council News

BEIJING, Dec. 18 (Xinhua) — The Second China-Russia Economic and Trade Conference, themed "Deepening Mutual Ties, Creating a Shared Future," was held in Tongjiang City, Northeast China's Heilongjiang Province, the Zhongxinwang news website reported.

During the conference, contracts were signed for the implementation of nine major projects worth a total of 10.3 billion yuan (approximately 1.46 billion US dollars), covering such areas as mechanical engineering and food processing.

The event featured a comprehensive program, including an opening ceremony, industry talks, project signings, field research, and other events. The focus was on key sectors such as modern agriculture, cross-border logistics, and digital trade.

The conference created an effective platform for enterprises from the two countries to conduct practical interactions and achieve deep synergies, and significantly promoted the integration and complementarity of industrial and supply chains, thereby helping to transform the advantages of both sides into powerful impetus for joint development and further expand the scale and deepen China-Russia economic and trade cooperation, according to the Publicity Department of the CPC Municipal Committee.

Divided from the Jewish Autonomous Region of Russia by the Heilongjiang (Amur) River, Tongjiang is a medium-sized port for Chinese-Russian waterway trade and a transshipment port for import and export cargo via multimodal river and sea transport. Furthermore, it is renowned as a "paradise of beautiful ecology" and the main settlement area of the Nanai people in China.

Please note: This information is raw content obtained directly from the source. It represents an accurate account of the source's assertions and does not necessarily reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.