Translation. Region: Russian Federation –
Source: People's Republic of China in Russian – People's Republic of China in Russian –
An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.
Source: People's Republic of China – State Council News
Beijing, December 9 (Xinhua) — From December 5 to 7, Nanjing University, located in Nanjing, the capital of East China's Jiangsu Province, hosted the International Forum "Russian Education: Legacy and Transformation." More than 100 education experts and scholars from China, Russia, Kazakhstan, and other countries participated in the forum, Nanjing University reported.
Participants engaged in an in-depth exchange of views on a wide range of issues, including the development trends of Russian education and the path to its modernization, as well as the current situation and historical development of Chinese-Russian cooperation in education.
They noted that deepening Chinese-Russian educational cooperation and academic dialogue is of great importance in the context of globalization. In the context of the China-Russia Years of Educational Cooperation to be held in 2026-2027, comparative research in education between the two countries holds great promise.
The forum included a presentation of the book "Russian Education: A Fundamental Course," compiled by a team led by Professor Wang Jiaxing of Nanik University. It contains a systematic analysis of the current situation and characteristics of the Russian education system, with a particular focus on Chinese-Russian educational exchanges and the development of Chinese language education in Russia.
The forum was jointly organized by the Subcommittee on Russian Language of the Steering Committee for the Teaching of Foreign Languages and Literatures in Higher Education Institutions under the Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China, the Institute of Foreign Languages of Nanjing University, and the Research Center for Russian Studies of Nanjing University.
Please note: This information is raw content obtained directly from the source. It represents an accurate account of the source's assertions and does not necessarily reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.