Translation. Region: Russian Federation –
Source: Saint Petersburg State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering –
An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.
Teams from 10 Russian universities participated in the championship: in person—SPbGASU, NNGASU, PNRPU, TIU, TSU, DVGUPS, and Vyatka State University; and remotely—NRU MGSU, SUSU, and TGASU. Each team worked on seven key competencies: architect, designer, heating and ventilation engineer, water supply and sanitation engineer, electrical engineer, estimator, and TIM coordinator.
Based on the expert jury's assessment, the SPbGASU team won the team championship, scoring 570.23 points.
The team from the Nizhny Novgorod State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering (NNGASU) took second place.
Third place went to the team from Tyumen Industrial University (TIU).
Winners in the team nomination: 1st place — SPbGASU • architect — Yana Safonova • designer — Vasily Goryunov • OV engineer — Nikita Ufimtsev • VV engineer — Egor Kvasha • electrical supply engineer — Sergey Sergeev • estimator — Andrey Orlov • TIM coordinator — Grigory Vorozhtsov
2nd place – NNGASUMilana Sergeeva, Alexey Bezborodov, Alexander Larin, Anastasia Moseeva, Andrey Kostikov, Ruslan Nabiev, Ekaterina Zakharova.
3rd place – TIUDaniel Oksanen, Ivan Makagonov, Evgeny Malygin, Igor Kazachkin, Anna Yarullina, Andrey Zhidaykin, Kirill Ivanov.
Winners of individual competencies
Best Team Coordinator: 1. Ekaterina Zakharova (NNSUACE) 2. Kirill Ivanov (TIU) 3. Nikita Protskikh (TSUACE)
Best estimator: 1. Matvey Abramov (SUSU NRU) 2. Andrey Orlov (SPbGASU) 3. Ruslan Nabiev (NNGASU)
Best Heating and Ventilation Engineer:1. Nikita Ufimtsev (SPbGASU)2. Alexander Larin (NNGASU)3. Egor Izmestyev (National Research University MGSU)
Best Water Supply and Sanitation Engineer: 1. Egor Kvasha (SPbGASU) 2. Anastasia Moseeva (NNGASU) 3. Ivan Utrobin (PNRPU)
Best designer: 1. Vasily Goryunov (SPbGASU) 2. Igor Dodchuk (TSU) 3. Kirill Kanyukov (Vyatka State University)
Best Architect: 1. Yana Mishova (TSUACE) 2. Daniel Oksanen (TIU) 3. Yana Safonova (SPbSUACE)
Best Electrical Power Engineer: 1. Anna Yarullina (TIU) 2. Sergey Sergeev (SPbGASU) 3. Andrey Kostikov (NNGASU)
The championship concluded in a celebratory atmosphere. The ceremony was attended by the event's partners, who support the development of digital design and annually help build a professional community of young professionals. Representatives of the partner organizations addressed the participants with parting words, congratulated the winners, and noted the students' high level of technical preparation.
Victoria Vinogradova, Vice Rector for Continuing Education at SPbGASU, addressed the finalists with a welcoming speech, emphasizing the importance of the championship as a practice-oriented platform for training future specialists in the construction industry. "The TIM Championship is an opportunity to prove yourself in an environment as close as possible to real-life project work. It's not just professional knowledge that's important, but also the ability to work in a team, make decisions, and adapt to complex challenges. All participants demonstrated a high level of preparation and a desire to continue developing," noted Victoria Vinogradova.
She thanked the Championship's partners and presented the winners and runners-up with commemorative prizes and diplomas, thanking the teams and mentors for their outstanding results and contribution to the development of digital technologies in construction.
Denis Nizhegorodtsev, Director of the Digital Competencies Educational Center at SPbGASU, noted that the championship once again confirmed its importance as a platform for developing professional skills: "The TIM Championship allows students to apply their knowledge in practice, work in a team, and develop a comprehensive approach to digital design. This experience shapes future industry specialists," he asserted.
The organizing committee has approved the results and will soon send information about the winners to the State Information Resource on Individuals with Outstanding Abilities.
Please note: This information is raw content obtained directly from the source. It represents an accurate account of the source's assertions and does not necessarily reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.