Translation. Region: Russian Federation –
Source: People's Republic of China in Russian – People's Republic of China in Russian –
An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.
Source: People's Republic of China – State Council News
BEIJING, Nov. 15 (Xinhua) — Beijing's Central Business District (CBD) ranked sixth in the world, up one place from 2020, according to the World Business District Attractiveness Report 2025 released Friday.
The report was first released by the international professional services firm EY, with the support of the Global Business District Innovation Club, in 2017. An updated version was published in 2020, marking the third edition.
The report's authors evaluate 30 leading business districts in 19 countries using a benchmarking system across eight categories, including talent, market proximity, influence, macroeconomic conditions, real estate, urban amenities, innovation, and sustainability. The ranking includes both specific categories and overall results.
The top five business districts worldwide include New York's downtown and financial district, Tokyo's Marunouchi District, Paris's La Défense District, and the City of London. Among other Chinese business districts, Hong Kong's Central District ranks 13th, Shanghai's Pudong-Lujiazui District ranks 14th, and Guangzhou's Tianhe Central Business District ranks 22nd.
Beijing's central business district, located in the Chaoyang district, received particularly high scores in the areas of urban amenities and talent. The report notes that it has successfully created a work-life-leisure ecosystem with a high density of cultural facilities, retail, restaurants, and public spaces.
The continued rise of Beijing's Central Business District in global rankings reflects the growing all-round competitiveness of Chinese cities on the global stage, according to the Beijing Central Business District Administration. -0-
Please note: This information is raw content obtained directly from the source. It represents an accurate account of the source's assertions and does not necessarily reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.