Translation. Region: Russian Federation –
Source: People's Republic of China in Russian – People's Republic of China in Russian –
An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.
Source: People's Republic of China – State Council News
Tashkent, March 12 (Xinhua) — The Environmental Code of the People's Republic of China, adopted at the 4th session of the 14th National People's Congress, became the second law in Chinese history to be called a "code," following the Civil Code. Uzbek political observer and journalist Sharofiddin Tulaganov, in an exclusive interview with Xinhua, stated that this step demonstrates China's transition to a qualitatively new level of systemic governance and ecological civilization and reflects Beijing's innovative approaches to global environmental governance.
According to the expert, systematizing disparate environmental legislation into a unified code is a strategic decision that transforms environmental standards into common norms for all of society.
Sh. Tulaganov particularly noted that the inclusion of a separate chapter in the document dedicated to green and low-carbon development is an innovative approach, being applied for the first time in global practice.
"Against the backdrop of a challenging global environmental situation, China's advancement of a green transformation in a more systemic and standardized manner can be considered one of the most sensible decisions. This is because green and low-carbon development is the primary solution to environmental and conservation challenges," the Xinhua source emphasized.
Sh. Tulaganov emphasized the importance of China's initiative to create the strictest legal mechanisms for environmental protection for Central Asian states, including Uzbekistan, which are also striving to develop a green economy.
“From this perspective, China’s initiative to systematize environmental legislation can be seen as an important experience for improving environmental policy in the region,” the expert noted. –0–
Please note: This information is raw content obtained directly from the source. It represents an accurate account of the source's assertions and does not necessarily reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.
