Translation. Region: Russian Federation –
Source: International Atomic Energy Agency –
An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.
IAEA Director General Rafael Mariano Grossi delivers a statement to the Board of Governors at the Agency's Headquarters in Vienna, Austria, 2 March 2026. Photo: D. Calma/IAEA
(Prepared for presentation at a Council meeting)
We are all following with concern the military strikes in the Islamic Republic of Iran and the Middle East.
The Agency immediately took action within its mandate, focusing on the potential for military-induced radiological emergencies.
In this regard, the IAEA's Incident and Emergency Centre (IEC) is involved, with a dedicated team collecting information and assessing the situation despite the restrictions imposed by the conflict.
The regional security monitoring network has been put on alert and is in constant communication with us. Currently, no increase in radiation levels above normal background levels has been recorded in countries bordering Iran.
Regarding the status of nuclear facilities in Iran, at this time we have no information that any nuclear facilities, including the Bushehr Nuclear Power Plant, the Tehran Research Reactor or other nuclear fuel cycle facilities, have been damaged or hit.
The IAC continues to attempt to establish contact with Iranian nuclear regulatory authorities, but has not yet received a response. We hope that this crucial channel of communication will be restored as soon as possible.
Iran and many other countries in the region that have been subjected to military strikes operate nuclear power plants and research reactors, along with associated fuel storage sites, increasing nuclear safety risks. The United Arab Emirates operates four nuclear reactors, while Jordan and Syria operate research reactors. Bahrain, Iraq, Qatar, Kuwait, Oman, and Saudi Arabia have also been subjected to strikes. All of these countries utilize nuclear technology to varying degrees. Therefore, we urge maximum restraint in any military operations.
In accordance with the objectives of the IAEA, as enshrined in its Statute, I again call on all parties to exercise maximum restraint to avoid further escalation.
Let me once again recall the General Conference resolutions of previous years, which state that armed attacks on nuclear installations are unacceptable and can lead to radioactive releases with serious consequences both within and beyond the borders of the State that is attacked.
To ensure long-term assurances that Iran will not acquire nuclear weapons and to maintain the effectiveness of the global non-proliferation regime, we must return to diplomacy and negotiation.
The Agency will continue to monitor the situation, drawing on its unique resources, extensive experience, and extensive international network. We will report any radiological consequences of the ongoing military actions and stand ready to provide advice and support to our Member States should threats to nuclear safety and security arise.
As you know, I am directly involved in supporting efforts to find a diplomatic solution to the impasse surrounding Iran's nuclear program. The negotiators invited me to the last two rounds of consultations in Geneva, where I provided impartial and technical advice from the IAEA.
However, this time the parties failed to reach an understanding. I believe we are all, understandably, deeply disappointed.
The use of force has accompanied international relations since time immemorial. It's a reality. However, this path is the least desirable of all.
I remain convinced that a lasting resolution to these long-standing disagreements is only possible at the diplomatic negotiating table. The IAEA stands ready to make its indispensable contribution immediately, wherever needed.
When it comes to nuclear issues, it is crucial to have a clear understanding of the scope and verifiability of the relevant agreement.
Diplomacy is a complex process, but there are no hopeless situations. Nuclear diplomacy presents even greater challenges, but even in this area, solutions can be found.
The question is not whether we will meet again at the negotiating table, but when it will happen – and we simply must do it as soon as possible.
Mr. Chairman, Your Excellencies,
In conclusion, let me reiterate that I am in close contact with Member States in the region affected by the current situation. The IAEA has a comprehensive understanding of the nature and location of nuclear and radiological materials in the region, and we have clear guidance on how to respond to a radiological release following an attack or accident, as well as the ability to provide practical assistance if needed. Let me emphasize that the current situation is of grave concern. We cannot rule out the possibility of a radiological release with serious consequences, including the need to evacuate areas comparable in size to, or even larger than, major cities. I can assure you that the IAEA is actively engaged, engaging with Member States, and keeping the international community informed, remaining prepared to respond immediately in the event of a nuclear security breach.
Please note: This information is raw content obtained directly from the source. It represents an accurate account of the source's assertions and does not necessarily reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.