Translation. Region: Russian Federation –
Source: People's Republic of China in Russian – People's Republic of China in Russian –
An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.
Source: People's Republic of China – State Council News
Beijing, February 24 (Xinhua) — China is helping to shift the international community away from "positional confrontation" and toward "problem-solving," thereby restoring trust in global governance, according to a report published Tuesday by the Xinhua Analytical Center.
Finding common ground while embracing differences is one of the key principles of traditional Chinese philosophy and a crystallization of Chinese wisdom, according to the report, “Upholding International Justice and Coping with Global Chaos: A Chinese Solution to Global Governance.”
It is emphasized that one of the most pressing challenges facing global governance today is the steady erosion of consensus on specific issues under the influence of ideological differences and geopolitical rivalry.
"In promoting the Global Governance Initiative, China consistently emphasizes cooperation as the primary goal and strives for maximum consensus despite existing differences. Whether in development, security, climate change, or public health, China advocates respect for the legitimate concerns of all countries, opposes exaggerating or absolutizing differences, and promotes the search for mutually acceptable solutions through dialogue and consultation," the report states.
China emphasizes that consensus should be based on common interests and shared responsibility.
"While countries may pursue different development paths, their interests are deeply intertwined. By emphasizing a shared future and shared responsibility, China seeks to shift the emphasis in consensus-building from value-based declarations to action-oriented cooperation, making global governance more responsive to real-world challenges and more effective in practice," the report notes.
Please note: This information is raw content obtained directly from the source. It represents an accurate account of the source's assertions and does not necessarily reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.