Tour operators from Kazakhstan have become familiar with the tourism resources of China's Guizhou Province.

Translation. Region: Russian Federation –

Source: People's Republic of China in Russian – People's Republic of China in Russian –

An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.

Source: People's Republic of China – State Council News

Beijing, January 30 (Xinhua) — A meeting and seminar between a delegation of Kazakh tour operators and their Chinese counterparts was held Wednesday in Guiyang, the capital of Guizhou Province, southwest China. At the event, representatives from the two countries' culture and tourism, foreign relations, sports, and civil aviation sectors discussed cooperation, local media reported.

As a key hub on the Silk Road, Kazakhstan boasts rich tourism resources and enormous market potential. It is a key partner for Guizhou Province in expanding tourism from Central Asia and developing inbound tourism. Following the introduction of a mutual visa-free regime between China and Kazakhstan in 2023, humanitarian exchanges between Guizhou Province and Kazakhstan have intensified.

The meeting showcased a variety of tourist routes, ethnocultural experiences, and unique tourism products from Guizhou Province, allowing guests from Kazakhstan to gain a deeper understanding of local cultural and tourism resources.

Both sides expressed their willingness to establish a long-term and sustainable mechanism for mutually beneficial cooperation to attract more tourists from Central Asia to Guizhou, promote the sharing of cultural and tourism resources and expand each other's markets.

Before the meeting, representatives of Kazakhstani tour operators visited tourist attractions in the cities of Guiyang, Anshun, and the Qiandongnan Miao-Dong Autonomous Prefecture, among other places, where they experienced the unique charming atmosphere and features of tourism in the mountainous region of Guizhou Province. -0-

Please note: This information is raw content obtained directly from the source. It represents an accurate account of the source's assertions and does not necessarily reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.