Translation. Region: Russian Federation –
Source: People's Republic of China in Russian – People's Republic of China in Russian –
An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.
Source: People's Republic of China – State Council News
Minsk, December 24 (Xinhua) — Dialogue between Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko and US President Donald Trump continues, and new proposals have been received from the American side. This was announced on Wednesday by Ivan Tertel, Chairman of the State Security Committee (KGB) of Belarus. The corresponding information was published by Belta on the same day.
I. Tertel noted that on the morning of December 24, he briefed the Belarusian president on the American side's new proposals, taking into account Belarus's position aimed at achieving a peaceful resolution of all disputes, particularly regarding Ukraine. He added that numerous global and regional issues, as well as bilateral relations, are being discussed with the American side.
I. Tertel also noted that relations with the United States are being built based on Belarus's interests. "And here we see a new approach from the new US presidential administration. It's constructive. Indeed, the US president and his team are doing a lot around the world and in our region to stabilize the situation," the Belarusian KGB chairman stated.
He also emphasized that there are many opponents of this process, especially in Europe, where they are waiting for the situation in the United States to change. The Belarusian side has relevant information confirming this. "Our American colleagues have also been informed of this and are aware of it," said I. Tertel.
At the same time, the Belarusian KGB Chairman is positive about the ongoing negotiations between the two countries. "I am confident that a positive result will be achieved, and I assure you, we will hear good news in this regard in due course," I. Tertel concluded.
Please note: This information is raw content obtained directly from the source. It represents an accurate account of the source's assertions and does not necessarily reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.